Restoring the definition of religion

Evangelicals, and even some Protestants associate religion with some dangerous Vatican attempt to sneak meritorious works into the gospel. This misunderstanding also stems from the overwhelming abuse done in the name of religion. But this is not a reason to undermine the biblical definition.

“Christianity is not a religion, but a relationship,” some insist. In fact, many gospel presentations are framed around this very premise. But this is not how the Bible speaks of religion. James speaks that a Christian ought to exercise “pure religion.”  Berkhof defines religion as a conscious and voluntary relationship to God, which expresses itself in grateful worship and loving service.” Hence, Christianity is both a religion and a relationship.

About these ads

About Uri Brito

I am the Pastor of Providence Church (CREC) in Pensacola, Fl.
This entry was posted in Theological Thoughts. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Restoring the definition of religion

  1. What I object to is when a religion is called a tradition…in place of religion. “The Christian tradition”…not meaning particular traditions within the religion, but the religion itself.

  2. Uri Brito says:

    Can you give me a specific example of this? Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s