Leithart on Infant Baptism

Leithart writes:

Church history provides a compelling argument in favor of infant baptism, but not in the usual way.  The argument is not that there is evidence of the practice of infant baptism throughout church history (though there is).  The argument is rather that the shape of church history is more compatible with paedobaptist than with credobaptist beliefs.

That is: The church did not appear in history in fully mature form; it is still far from fully mature.  Were the infant churches of the apostolic age Christian churches? Did the troubled Corinthian congregation count as a Christian communion?  Galatia?   We should say Yes, since Paul treated these churches as churches.

Infant churches are Christian churches, immature and inadequate though they may be.  Ergo….

About these ads

About Uri Brito

I am the Pastor of Providence Church (CREC) in Pensacola, Fl.
This entry was posted in Peter Leithart. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s